They say not to be a prisoner of your past, but you are when you are dealing with the system.. !

  

   Today we went for a bond reduction hearing & instead of looking at the case these days, the District Attorney's office brought up the charges he had on Richard when he was 18 & 20 years old. That's 24 years ago & why should it matter in a case today?  He was a kid then & those type charges have not applied since then either & so why does it have a bearing on his life today?

    He had finished his time for that & we are talking about someone's life which has changed & since they been released they have had no charges referring to actual crime being done & all he has received is this possession charge.

  After being incarcerated now 9 months & after all the work we been trying to do., we asked for a bond reduction court date & finally got it. But at the hearing, although Richard's Attorney Micah Sielert covered the difference in Richard's life these days, & he was working & would be allowed back at his job upon release.. That Richard has lived here all his life & he has his family was here too. That he has people to stand by him too. BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY this case was set at $58,000 & the defendant had been in that jail for 8 months & because of inability to pay, then the family had asked for a bond reduction.  Rules are that a bond is not meant for pre-trial detention & supposed to be set at ability to pay. 

   MICAH SIELERT did an decent presentation of the facts & I was shocked to hear the DISTRICT ATTORNEY 'John Brewer' who came in & he took Richard's charges that he had 20 years ago & used them as if they were a current case now...  Never did he distinguish this, nor did he clarify what had actually been within the last 10 year period that supposed to matter.

Richard had charges from 1995, when he was 18 years old & that was almost 25  years ago.  The others were 18 years ago, & that's the jist of his charges that hold him as a felon & as being a violent offender too. So hearing the life of an 18 year old gang member instead of even the last 2 decades, caused the Judge to decide to keep him at an outrageous bond amount that was not set for his current charges as a single offence, or within a 10 year time period... 

Richard has had nothing since his last release, besides this illegally obtained search & harassment, which did help lead him back into a continuous cycle that even I have given up on the system ever letting anybody make a change because Richard's past will always define him & that's all they give room for.  

And crazy as it sounds a case that is for others a misdemeanor charge they choose continue to stick with15 years prison sentence as the offer even though it shows to be a possession charge naturally & then even offered to reduce to that.

Besides these old cases then Richard was only in trouble once & that was 7 years ago when he grabbed a toolbox out of the back of a truck. They have it listed as Burglary 2 & for that one incident in 2012 he was incarcerated 5 years, & now it's another possession & they want to throw 15 years in it because of what he did when he was a young & that was 25 years ago.  Richard grew up on SE 23rd & Central which was the very worst side of town. I don't really have a record myself but I grew up in Moore where nothing goes on & I never been apart of surroundings being bad. His side of town was extremely violent & he has changed his life enough that in the past 18 years he was only arrested for this petty case & another, & the other had been 7 years back, which is nothing much. And for why was it all for when they use your past, which you done learned from, against you while you doing good.. .?

 (it's always a life sentence with the system & that's why stastitics prove that once someone has been incarcerated it continues to repeat itself)

Why do they make sayings like these if are system don't believe in them? 

  (" We all have a past, the difference between those people who achieve thier dreams & the difference between those who don't is they don't let the past define them.")

   ("Your mistakes don't define your character, it's what you do after you have made the mistake that makes all the difference.")

   I have learnt that it's always a life sentence & that's what causes things to never change! That's why all these new laws won't change a thing either, because they find a way to not make it pertain to you. Once someone offends then their life has become that even after they finished their sentence & even if they been trying to change thier life.

  The cops have harrassed him anyways ever since he returned to the streets & YOU CANT FIGHT NOTHING IN OKLAHOMA COUNTY BECAUSE EVERYTHING THE REPRESENTATIVES DO HERE IS ILLEGAL & THEY DECIDE WHO THEY WANT & THEY MAKE SURE IT ENDS THAT WAY. 

  While everything they do has 'just cause' & officers get away with murder, even though most all those cases are unarmed men, & these officers kill someone because 10 officers feel threatened by one man carrying a stick!  

( https://newsok.com/article/5575356/da-clears-okc-police-officer-in-fatal-shooting-of-deaf-man )

    I feel the 10 years after a sentence is already crazy because they give someone a 5 year deferred & then make it to where even 10 years after that it still matters. Don't they mean a 15 deferred because a deferred is basically promising that you won't get in any trouble for those 5 years or else you will do time. But even 10 years after then you get in trouble your gonna do that time still because that gives you priors & see so whatever they have you on doubles. So you best hope it is not a rough charge because it don't matter how minor your prior charge was because enhancements don't work like you would think here. Enhancements are not for repeating the same type charge like I thought.. . Enhancements come solely because of previous charge, or charges..  

  Well, come to find out now it's really a life sentence once you have had a charge because  the ones they brought up at Richard's court date which made him sound like a violent offender were the ones that happened  22-24 years ago. Not anything was mentioned by the Prosecutor in that case today that was within those 10 years back even. Otherwise he would not have those type charges to make his case sound bad at all.

  It seems to work because this is actually giving them reason to charge him with 15 years in prison over a possession charge,!  So why not just call everything a life sentence & just leave it at that !

   You would think it would be based on your recent life & that's why they say once someone goes to prison then it leads them back again & again. Maybe it's not them & maybe it's because we never accept their change & therefore never allow it to stay that way! . 

I guess its legal but the law is fucked up & people dont live all that damn long once adults. My mom died at 53 & so I might have 30 years to live as well as an adult. If you take a 10 year deffered & then add 10 years after that in order to say somebody has priors & use it to convict twice harder.., then you may as well of called it a 20 year sentence. Nineteen years later if you caught a case then they come back & use it on you in order to give you twice the punishment is crazy because you did your time for that case & been good for 19 years, & its still going to fuck you because thats how they like to do things. ??? 

• Allows for enhancement of sentence for those facing criminal charges alleging they committed a new offense within 10 years of the completion of a previous sentence. (Not the sentencing date, the completion of the probation or discharge of the prison sentence.)
• 
  

*** So they go by your sentencing date when they come up with the laws changing although you have not been sentenced yet. But when they want to convict you then your sentencing date is not what matters. I GET IT. THEY ARE HYPOCRITES.** 

           Yours truly,   STACY PRIVETT

Arresting officer Abraham Luna -Sante Fe Division threats to arrest using color of law

  A few months before the arrest of Richard Urrutia, the Oklahoma City police swerved in front of us demanding hands put up.  They put me in a car after telling me that they just wanted to talk to him.. While I was sitting in the back of the car the officer said he would run my name real quick.    
   
  Those officers take some minutes, then soon surround me.  Basically saying there was somethin found in a bag after they moved us & they needed me to let them know if Richard had thrown it. 

   

   I couldn't say that I seen him throw it & it became threats that they would then have to charge both of us..  As one officer gets angry he then splurts out that they planned on taking him for possession regardless at one point when we spoke & really if I just said it was his then they would of let me go. But otherwise they would have to charge both of us for it.   

  Because of this story I also arrested on possession charges & I thought I would spend forever in jail,  or worse & go to prison.  I have a previous case that I signed for just to be let out of jail but nothing legal was done in first place. 

   If you look up my record then it shows the possessions probable cause hearing but it goes no further on this one. (3-20-2018). It shows on my OSCN for probable cause that next morning but nothing at all is shown on his record.

    ANYWAYS BACK TO THIS STORY.. .

   This time the crazy thing was that just as morning hit, about 8am, the jail personal came to release me. When we were exiting the pod she told me that they decided not to file charges on me. I was released but not him. He was held for 10 days like i should have been because its odd for them to pull you first thing in morning to release you because they decided not to file.   And how & why does a jail officer even have that info?

  Richard waited out his 10 days but once he was released he tells me that the jail officer who took him to arraignment actually told him, while they were standing there for arraignment, that they decided to let me go.. 
   
  Later on I had realized that basically they had tried to get me to set him up & would of used me saying it was his to have their proof. That's why they made me believe that I was going to have a case on me.  I believed them at that time & I was scared to death & crying as I went to jail. 

        NOW THINK ABOUT IT..... .

   Richard was not driving anything when officer pulled in the parkinglot at that corner shopping center. A friend of mine named Carrie was posted outside at gas pumps. She stated the officer pulled in & got out & walked straight in the store. Our other friend, Ashley, was posted behind Pico in line. The officer came in the store with the intentions to arrest Pico. Ashley stated that the officer 1st asked Pico if he driving the red truck & Pico stated No'.   As Pico began to walk away the officer said "Dont make me take you down", & Pico stopped. 

  The store clerk told me that the officer asked him if Pico had paid for that pump & what he used to pay. The store clerk stated to me that he answered the officer by saying that the defendant had not even got a chance to pay yet so he had not used nothing to pay for anything, so he did not know.

    The officer arrested Richard for stolen vehicle that parked in lot even though nobody seen him driving any vehicle anywhere. Of course at court they deopped that charge because of the facts & that meant they had no probable cause for his arrest. But after arresting him & searching him they found a bag of stuff in his pocket. They continue to charge him on it although technically with 'Illegal Search & Siezure' then they have no right to keep any charge

.

   I HAVE NOT BELIEVED IN OKLAHOMA COUNTY OFFICERS THIS ENTIRE TIME.  Or the courts too much!  

  -- But if you want to ask why they would target Richard as they do then I will tell you.. . .

   The reason they plot against him is because of something that happened when he was 18 & I know this because i have watched the police harass him once& right after Richard was first released.  They mentioned a case where an officer was shot & the name was 'Bearbow'.& I guess when Richard was 18 years old he was riding with another guy who had stole a car. The police chased them & the other guy opened fire on the officer. It killed him & I think the guys name was Bearbow. Richard got off on the charges because he was not the person shooting at anybody & the other guy did & went to prison. But when the cops first harrassed Richard one day they spoke of this.

    Also I know a man who was continually speaking to an officer from the Oklahoma city Sante Fe division on trying to get Richard arrested & the officer that came out to his place, I know, the officer also spoke both English & Spanish.  So, I figured that must be Officer Luna because the day of Richard's arrest, that officer aproached Richard & arrested him within a crowd of others because supposedly there was a parked stolen truck out at the gas pumps. The officer had no probable cause to arrest Richard because the officer had not seen Richard driving anything & by the questions asked to both 'Pico' & the store clerk at the registar, nothing said Richard had driven anything. Of course that charge of Unauthorized Use of Vehicle was dropped once the officer testified but the dope found during what makes an illegal arrest in the 1st place held. Richard should of never been searched & now the D.A comes at him with 15 years on that. The officer stated at arrest that he going to charge him with whatever he can & the biggest he can.

  ( The man who I speak about is Raul Vibillos-Jaurez but he changes his name alot, & he lived just a few houses down at 721 SE 48th OKC but not anymore.)

SINCE I BEEN IN OKLAHOMA CITY I HAVE SEEN TOO MUCH BAD POLITICS TO WATCH PEOPLE IN POLITICS BE SO JUDGEMENTAL.. . 

                      Stacy Privett

******************************

     WELL ACTUALLY, just because someone lives in a certain area they are treated like they are a criminals in Oklahoma City. They are somehow already labeled & therefore automatically treated so by our justice system here, & therefore my theory is that's how they become part of the justice system.

  "When you see somebody as a criminal & therefore automatically assume & prosecute them as one..,  then I guess they have no choice because the system makes them that through targeting & then prosecuting the innocent without real cause. 

( I am a felon because of this so don't tell me that it does not happen. I been there twice but only in OKC. And here is a 3rd time I thought for sure would send me to prison, but I am lucky it didn't. I thought again I was going to have a charge & I never seen myself going to prison in my life, or being a felon either, because I don't actually do anything bad like that).